Case Study 5: Wolinski National Park and Miedzyzdrjo

Posted by

On our final day we visited the coast, staying in accommodation in Kamien Pomorski on the Zalew Kamienski, a large lagoon connected to the even larger Szczecin Lagoon. The lagoons are separated from the sea by only a narrow stretch of land and are saline due to connectivity with the sea via short channels. This contributes to a very interesting landform and ecology.

Case Study 5 - the coastThe area has become a very popular area for tourism, with many Germans and Poles traveling to visit the attractive beaches and coastline. This popularity has contributed to the growth of a number of large settlements and contributes to relatively intense visitor pressure, particularly in areas near the coast.

We visited the seaside resort of Miedzyzdroje, a settlement with a permanent population of only around 5000 people but with a much larger influx of visitors during holiday periods. The Wolinski National Park covers the area immediately East of Miedzyzdroje and managing the intense visitor pressure on the area is a key challenge for the national park authority.

The national park authority has its headquarters in Miedzyzdroje and the headquarters complex includes a visitor centre. The visitor centre provides a popular wet weather tourist attractions and serves to explain local natural and cultural heritage to visitors. Our group spent some time in the natural heritage exhibition and in an exhibition showcasing some of the local archaeological work and ancient finds. The natural heritage exhibition was interesting in that it made extensive use of taxidermy, not a technique that is common in the UK. There was a particularly large collection of ruff, highlighting how important the area is for this wading species in winter. The Exhibition highlighted how the national park was important for cultural heritage as well as natural heritage, an area of interest not typically part of the remit of national parks in Poland. This contrasts with national parks in Scotland, where one of the statutory aims of national parks is to conserve and enhance the natural and cultural heritage, with no particular prioritisation being made between natural and cultural heritage. In Scotland, some would argue that the inclusion of the cultural element of this aim has diluted the benefits of the national parks to natural heritage, so it was fascinating to hear that national parks in Poland are only starting to explore how cultural heritage may be considered and that there was no existing legal requirement for them to do so. 17

Case Study 5 - view pointAfter the visitor centre we stopped at a cafe and viewpoint overlooking large reedbed islands in the estuary. Such a large area of natural reedbed wetlands is unlike anything we have at home and the cafe and viewpoint was a fantastic place to view the expanse of this habitat, a small part of which is managed by the Society for the Coast.

We also visited a spectacular viewpoint on a steep coastal hillside close to Miedzyzdoje. The site had been used as a cold war look out station but post-communism had been opened up for public access and had since become a very popular visitor destination. Although scarcely a couple of hundred meters high, in the generally flat landscape, the viewpoint offered very attractive views. It was part of a geological cliff along the coast, which formed the high point of the narrow strip of land separating the Baltic sea from the lagoons behind. The cliff was formed from sedimentary material and dunes stabilised by forestry and other vegetation. As in many areas of West Pomerania, the area was heavily wooded with mixed broadleaf woodland. The amount of woodland was a stark contrast to the relatively treeless landscapes, even in the lowlands, that we are used to in Scotland.

The potential for conflict between visitor and development pressure and nature conservation was highlighted more in Wolinski National Park than any of the other areas we visited. It was also interesting to see the differences in approach between Polish national parks and Scottish national parks. In Poland, although many are in mountainous or upland areas, there are national parks across the country. They are relatively small and typically have a clear focus on nature conservation. In Scotland we have just two large national parks, Loch Lomond and the Trossachs being the smaller and covering an area of 1,865 km 2 . The Cairngorms is much larger at 4,528km 2 , which is much larger than Polish national parks. The aims of national parks in Scotland are also quite different. National Parks in Scotland have four statutory aims, as set out in the National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000:

(a) to conserve and enhance the natural and cultural heritage of the area,

(b) to promote sustainable use of the natural resources of the area,

(c) to promote understanding and enjoyment (including enjoyment in the form of recreation) of the special qualities of the area by the public, and

(d) to promote sustainable economic and social development of the area’s communities.

This means that Scottish national park authorities and other public bodies are required to actively promote development in the national parks as well as conserving and enhancing natural and cultural heritage. As a result, there have been a number of high profile development proposals in Scotland’s national parks. This seems to contrast with Polish national parks, where, although 18 development could happen, as we saw through the development of a new lifeline road through Wolinski National Park, this was very much the exception.

Conclusions and Recommendations

This was a particularly interesting day, with the issue of reconciling recreational and visitor pressure a clear common difficulty between Poland and Scotland. Of particular interest was the fact that Wolinski National Park, a national park with much stricter protection than the national parks in Scotland, was able to resist the vast majority of development pressure and yet was still able to make a significant contribution to local economic development by providing a popular visitor attraction and resource. In Scotland, proposals for new national parks or other protected areas are inevitably met with strong resistance from those with primarily economic interests, who suggest that their presence will be economically damaging. In this instance at least, this clearly has not been the case. While there are still challenges, the example of Wolinski National Park seems to show that a relatively strict protection of natural resources can coexist with very successful and busy local communities – an important lesson for Scotland as we look to progress long awaited additional national parks and other protected areas.

Conversely, there seemed to be less investment in interpretation and access related to wildlife than we are used to. It seemed that real opportunities exist to promote the wildlife value of this area and add to the visitor experience. While this would need to be done with care, it appears to offer significant potential to develop eco-tourism businesses that would benefit local communities and provide an incentive to conserve and enhance the wildlife of the area.

Previous: 4, Odra Delta  — — — — — NextConclusions (Overall)

Recent Posts

Introduction and Finnish Forestry Overview Over two-thirds of Finland is forest cover. This expanse of forest cover may be one of the reasons most of the population seems to be well connected to nature, because most people live within reach of nature. Not only do people live near nature, but many are able to own a small piece of it as much of the forested area is owned by private persons. Accessibility is also important because many people are able to use the forest, even if they do not own any forests themselves. Subject to certain rules and regulations, people are able to use the forest and the wildlife within it as a renewable resource for wood products, hunting and foraging. Above all, most Finnish people strongly value the link between being in nature and good health.

Loading…